­
  • Home
  • Match Centre
  • British & Irish Lions
  • Videos
  • Supabets
  • Cars
    • Motoring News
    • Used Cars For Sale
    • New Cars For Sale
    • Demo Cars For Sale
  • Daddy’s Deals

SA Rugbymag

South African rugby news, fixtures, results, video, interviews, and more. Covering the Springboks, Bulls, Stormers/Western Province, Sharks, Cheetahs, Kings and Lions, as well as schools and club rugby.

Primary Menu Search
  • Home
  • Match Centre
  • British & Irish Lions
  • Videos
  • Supabets
  • Cars
    • Motoring News
    • Used Cars For Sale
    • New Cars For Sale
    • Demo Cars For Sale
  • Daddy’s Deals

You are here: Home ∼ Coetzee’s Boks worst ever

Coetzee’s Boks worst ever

Coetzee’s Boks worst ever
Published on November 28, 2016 | Leave a response

Logic suggests that the pain of 2016 ended for Springbok supporters when the final whistle sounded on statistically the worst year of Bok rugby, writes MARK KEOHANE.

Allister Coetzee’s Boks won four from 12 Tests and drew against the Barbarians in a non-international match.

It’s not an opinion that Coetzee’s Boks are the worst performing in the history of the Springboks – it’s a fact. No other Bok team has lost eight Tests in a calendar season.

Coetzee’s Boks did this. They also became the second team in the history of the Springboks to be winless on an end-of-year tour to the northern hemisphere. They are the first Bok team to lose to Italy and to lose at home to Ireland. They also broke the record for most points conceded against the All Blacks in Durban (57) and points differential (42). They conceded 15 tries in two Tests against the All Blacks in 2016 and 98 points.

They are also the first team to not win a game overseas in the Rugby Championship and they are also the first Bok team to lose to the Pumas in Argentina.

There is nothing emotional about condemning Coetzee and his selections. The great and successful international coaches are foremost renowned as selectors of talent. They know what combinations to select.

If the devil is in the detail, then analyse Coetzee’s Test match selections over the 12 Tests. The evil is clearly his inability to select well.

Coetzee is not good enough to be at the helm of the Springboks and his refusal to accept responsibility is merely confirmation of his inability to see his flaws.

Coetzee, consistently, has described each Test loss as a dark day, his darkest day and as a shock. He never saw it coming even though the rest of the rugby world did.

He never gave an answer and his rhetoric insisted him having no regrets as head coach and final match-day squad selector.

He also said he wouldn’t have picked any other captain than Adriaan Strauss.

He also has said he doesn’t see colour in his selections, so he picked what he believed to be the best match-day squad on merit.

Coetzee, at no time, was restricted because of a transformation ideal that resulted in him having to compromise on selections.

The South African Rugby Union in 2016 set a 35% black-player representation in every starting XV in Super Rugby and at Test level.

Coetzee, in 12 Tests, matched and exceeded the target on just three occasions. He lost the core of his Tests with a primarily white team. Transformation, in Test selections, in no way is an excuse or justification for the coach’s obvious limitations.

Criticism of Coetzee has nothing to do with his colour. It is of his results and his refusal to ever accept there was another way to his losing one.

Coetzee’s Boks can’t cause Bok supporters any more pain, but the relief of the season being over with the final whistle of 2016 lasted six minutes when it should have been six months.

Enter Coetzee and his post-match interview: It was tough, he said, losing again and losing to Wales, but it represented, in his words, a fresh start for the Boks in 2017 and a new beginning for Springbok rugby.

The horror had started all over again. It was Newlands (versus Ireland) and 15 Boks versus 14 Irish and that sinking feeling at the final whistle …

Coetzee was insistent he could not singularly be held accountable. He was adamant he was going nowhere. He was not to blame. He had a four-year contract and he felt he was the right man and capable to be in charge of the Boks.

He summarised Bok rugby as ‘it is what it is’ – and he did so with a smile.

Worse was to follow when Saru’s president Mark Alexander, via a press statement, said no emotional decisions would be made and that another indaba would follow, more meetings, and that more committees would be appointed and that the same men who appointed Coetzee would analyse his results and that there would be no knee-jerk reaction to the worst-ever Bok season …

Oh, my goodness …

Alexander’s press statement and Coetzee’s absolute denial, presented as in the singular, was more emphatically damning and draining than any All Blacks defeat.

Nothing will change in 2017. All the incompetents have rallied to protect each other’s lack of pedigree and potency.

On Coetzee’s appointment I wrote that the Boks would be more a top-five than top-three team. Within six months he has taken them from three to six in the world order.

Enough said.

*Read Keohane on www.twitter.com/mark_keohane

Photo: Gabriele Maltinti/Getty Images

Posted in Uncategorized

Post by SA Rugby magazine

SA Rugby magazine

MPU #1 - (DESKTOP SIZE 300x250 / MOBILE SIZE 320x50, 300x250, 320x100)
← Previous Next →

Ratings: Du Toit one of the few standouts for Boks

The Boks faded in the second half to slump to a 22-17...

Five key areas the Boks need to dominate for first victory

SA Rugby magazine highlights five crucial areas the Boks will need to...

Duhan should be celebrated for his Lions success

Duhan van der Merwe’s achievements should be truly appreciated by South Africans,...

JdV: Boks-Lions have everything to play for

Performing in empty stadiums will be a key factor in the series...

Dynamic Dayimani: Forward to back

While he has been signed as an ‘edge’ forward, Hacjivah Dayimani could...

Boks have muscle memory to rely on

Rassie Erasmus and Jacques Nienaber are experts at finding solutions to tricky...

Top six: Best and worst foreign imports

SARugbymag.co.za identifies six of the best and worst foreign players to play...

Column: When context is needed

As highlighted by the Argentina controversy, ‘cancel culture’ needs a spoonful of...

Dark cloud hangs over WP Rugby

The problems at Western Province Rugby are layered, and everyone involved needs...

From the mag: Foreign Favourites

As Vodacom Super Rugby turned 25 this year, JON CARDINELLI picks an...

Bulls rookies to watch

After a massive exodus of players the Vodacom Bulls will be eager...

Analysis: The new suffocate-and-strangle game

For the Boks to emerge as World Cup winners, they need to...

VIEW MORE
  • Team graphics: Springboks vs B&I Lions
  • Boks vs Lions (1st Test): Predict and WIN!
  • Lions team announcement: Duhan to front Boks
  • Teams: SA A vs Bulls
Boks

Why the Boks should be bullish

There is good reason for the Springboks to enter the British & Irish Lions series with confidence, writes MARK KEOHANE in the latest SA Rugby magazine.

  • Watch: Did Gatland’s words influence Jonker?


COVID-19 Corona Virus
South African Resource Portal

ABOUT

  • Contact us
  • Competitions
  • Videos
  • Player Features
  • Subscribe
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy Policy

TOURNAMENTS

    • Rugby Championship
    • Super Rugby
    • Currie Cup
    • Varsity Cup
    • Gold Cup
    • Schools
    • Six Nations
    • Champions Cup
    • World Cup

OPINION

  • Mallett on SuperSport
  • Cardinelli column
  • Lewis column
  • Xabanisa column
  • Borchardt column
  • Superbru

Primary Menu

  • Home
  • Match Centre
  • British & Irish Lions
  • Videos
  • Supabets
  • Cars
    • Motoring News
    • Used Cars For Sale
    • New Cars For Sale
    • Demo Cars For Sale
  • Daddy’s Deals
×